AriaScout receives a requisition from your ATS and runs the full desk — sourcing, deduplication, ranking, multi-channel outreach, voice screening and formatted submission. Free to start, with no seat licence and no platform fee. Sourcing, outreach and voice screening cost you nothing — you pay only when a screened, interested candidate reaches your pipeline.
| Requisition | Stage | Pipeline | Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|
Senior Java Developer REQ-4417 · Remote · W2 |
Screening |
184 | 6 |
RN — Med/Surg REQ-4402 · Dallas, TX · Contract |
Outreach |
312 | 4 |
Salesforce Architect REQ-4389 · Hybrid · C2C |
Submitted |
97 | 8 |
Warehouse Supervisor REQ-4431 · Austin, TX · Direct |
Sourcing |
421 | 0 |
Each stage below runs without queuing work back to a human. The agent does not surface a shortlist for someone to action; it actions it and reports the outcome to your ATS.
Your ATS stays the system of record and the only thing your team connects. Sourcing, scoring, outreach and screening run on our side of the line.
Nothing new for your team to run. Requisitions flow out of your ATS, the agent works them on our infrastructure, and finished submissions land back in the same records your recruiters already use.
AriaScout operates across a network of staffing firms, so it observes what any single ATS cannot: how a candidate behaves everywhere else. That cross-network signal is what makes an autonomous submission defensible rather than reckless.
How much competing recruiter activity a candidate is receiving right now, so outreach reaches them before the market closes.
Resume claims reconciled against what the same person reported elsewhere on the network — dates, titles, rates and authorisation.
The rate a candidate actually accepts, derived from observed outcomes rather than the figure on the application.
The channel and time of day this individual replies on, so the sequence is targeted rather than sprayed.
How many times a candidate has been submitted recently, preventing duplicate submissions and client friction.
Early behavioural signals that a candidate is disengaging, flagged before a submission goes cold on your client.
Outcome pricing only makes sense if the arithmetic holds at your volumes. Adjust the inputs and the conversion assumptions to match how your desk actually performs.
| Submissions produced | 0 |
| Interviews generated | 0 |
| Placements | 0 |
| Gross profit created | $0 |
| AriaScout cost — submissions @ $5 | $0 |
| AriaScout cost — interviews @ $10 | $0 |
| AriaScout cost — placements @ $25 | $0 |
| Total AriaScout cost | $0 |
Illustrative only. The model assumes AriaScout works the requisitions you feed it and that your conversion rates hold at higher submission volume. Cost is incurred at each outcome regardless of whether the next one occurs.
No per-recruiter licence, no platform fee, no annual minimum and nothing to pay to begin. The agent sources, contacts and screens at our cost. The first invoice only exists once a screened, interested candidate is sitting in your pipeline.
AriaScout takes the repetitive half of the desk. The half that decides whether a deal closes stays exactly where it is.
Autonomy is only purchasable if it can be constrained, inspected and stopped. Three things stay entirely under your control.
Channels, cadence, rate ceilings, client exclusivity, off-limits accounts and do-not-contact lists are enforced by the orchestration layer before an action is taken. The agent does not improvise past them.
Each submission carries the scoring rationale, the complete outreach history and the screening transcript. Any action the agent took is reconstructable after the fact, including the ones that led nowhere.
Pause a requisition, a channel or the entire agent instantly. Any stage can be switched back to human review without discarding the work already completed.
Candidate records sourced for your requisitions remain yours. Cross-network signals are derived and aggregated, never resold as raw records.
Consent, opt-out handling and messaging identity are configured per client and enforced before any message is sent.
Recording disclosure is delivered at call start and retention windows are configurable per jurisdiction.
Full decision and action log per requisition, exportable for client or internal review.
Confirm current posture with the account team before contracting.
Nobody hands an autonomous agent their full book on day one, and we do not ask them to. Scope expands as evidence accumulates.
ATS connection made, client and compliance rules loaded, off-limits and do-not-contact lists imported.
The agent works live requisitions and builds submissions your recruiters release by hand. You compare its output against your own desk.
Requisition types you nominate run unattended all the way through to submission. Everything outside that list stays gated.
Coverage widens by client, role family and geography, with governance thresholds reviewed at every expansion.
Nothing advances on its own. Each phase opens only when you decide the evidence from the previous one justifies it, and any phase can be rolled back without losing the work already done.
Yes. There is no licence, no platform fee, no onboarding charge and no annual minimum. We connect to your ATS, load your rules and start working requisitions at our cost — including the job board subscriptions, which run on ours rather than yours. You are invoiced for the first time only when a screened candidate who has confirmed interest, availability and rate arrives in your pipeline. If none ever does, you never receive an invoice.
You are not billed for a submission your team rejects at review during shadow and release phases, and the scoring rationale is attached to every record so the failure mode is visible rather than mysterious. Rejection reasons feed back into the scoring model for that client.
No. It takes the sourcing and screening hours, not the desk. Everything that decides whether a placement happens — the client relationship, the judgement call on a borderline candidate, the close — stays with your team, and they get it back with more time. Most operators start by pointing the agent at requisitions nobody had capacity to work: overflow, low-margin roles, second-tier clients. Recruiters tend to become the advocates once they see it clear the backlog rather than the desk.
Integration is via requisition ingest and submission write-back, which covers the major staffing ATS platforms. Confirm your specific system and version with the account team during scoping.
Every sourced record is deduplicated against your own database before outreach, and cross-network burn rate flags candidates who have been submitted repeatedly in the recent past — a signal a single-tenant tool cannot see.
Yes. Disclosure is delivered at the start of the screening call, and recording consent and retention are configured per jurisdiction.
Outcome-based, with no seat licence or annual minimum. Volume commitments and rate adjustments are available for enterprise deployments.
We will run AriaScout against a live req from your desk and show you exactly what comes back — the candidates, the scoring rationale and the screening transcripts.